A friend of mine told me about a presentation he was preparing for a company event a few weeks ago. It was very important and all the other groups in this company had months to prepare for it. But he and his team were only notified the week before the event.
At first they felt unprepared and unable to get anything ready in time and on par with the other presentations. But they didn't have a choice so they worked hard for a week and just gave it their best shot.
The result: their presentation was by far the most original, clear and professional one of all. This is an endorsement for my Deserted Island Strategy ideas but it also reminded me of another lesson from art school: If you add too many colors to a painting and mix them all up the result is a painting that isn't bright and multi colored but muddy brown and without depth.
And muddy brown and without depth is a pretty accurate description of most company presentations, isn't it? We all know how these things work when too much time is spend and too many people have to look at things and offer their opinion. You start out with a fresh and genuine idea but then everybody has to throw in their own original ideas too just to show that they are quite inventive too. The end result after all this friendly advice and modifications is a weak product with no identity and no sharp edges.
Sometimes is pays off to take a more intuitive approach to making a presentation, writing a document or doing anything in general. Try this on Monday:
If you have to make a decision, follow your first instinct
How do you do that? Simply by doing the first thing that comes up and sticking with it. Your second thought might be 'That doesn't seem logical' or 'that would be too funny' but ignore those thoughts and just do what you intuitively thought was right. Post the result in the comments here.
Word of advice: when you operate a nuclear sub or work with dangerous substances or doing any other work which might kill you if done wrong please ignore this post.|W|P|114633806205601255|W|P|Intuitive Decision Making|W|P|bomega@gmail.cominvestor: "So how much money do you need" entrepreneur: "About a million" investor: "Sounds reasonable, and much do I get for that?" entrepreneur: "10%" investor: "10%??? So you value your company at 10 million right now? I don't think so. I was more thinking along the lines of a 2.5 million valuation."I have had to defend myself a few times in this situation but also used the same argument when talking with other entrepreneurs. But I don't like it one bit. I think we need another way to look at this and I have come up with a simple formula which I would like to call the Sliding Scale Valuation Formula.
The basic thinking goes like this: If I pay 1 euro for 10% then 100% must be worth 10 euros. Simple and clean and shown in the illustration. But what entrepreneurs and investors often overlook is that in reality each share has a different value.
One simple way to prove this is if you would own 10% and would be able to buy 1% more. If the company would be worth 1 million that one percent would cost you 10.000. Right?
Now let's assume you have 50%. Would that extra 1% still cost just 10.000, or would you be willing to pay more for it? Having 50% or 51% in a company makes all the difference so my guess is that you would easily pay more than 10 times the amount.
So all percentages are not created and valued equal.
Another example, in the form of a very old joke: a man pulls into a gas station and asks the owner: 'How much for one drop of gasoline? The owner replies 'don't worry, that's free' to which the man replies 'Ok, give me a full tank of gasoline drops then'.
We all understand that there is a huge difference between one drop of a full tanks of gas. So why does this not apply to a start-up? Why does the selling of 10% for 10 imply that the other 90% must be worth 90? It doesn't. In fact, the other 90% is completely worthless to anyone but the owners. If they would sell the full 90% there wouldn't be a company left.
So in fact there is a sliding scale in the valuation of a start-up which I illustrated here too. Each company is different and the numbers are influenced by the percentage you sell, the number of shareholders and the age and status of your company and so each sliding scale will be different. In some cases the scale might even tip the other way which would mean that the percentage you are selling is worth less then the percentage you keep. And the more value is inserted into the company and the more shareholders you have the more likely it will be that the scale evens out and a percentage actually equals a percentage.
But for start-ups I think we need a Sliding Scale Valuation Formula.
So what formula do we use? If you find a good investor, with a great network and fantastic ideas his investment easily doubles the chance that your start-up turns into a successful company. So it doesn't really matter if he has 5%, 10% or 35%, his investment is responsible for 50% of your success. So let's use that as a starting point and construct the following formula:
What the investor invests is doubled to calculate the value of the start-up
Simple, elegant and effective. It helps you defend the percentage you are offering and puts a bunch of feathers up the butt of the investor because you get to explain that he is responsible for 50% of your success.
So the next time a VC or investor asks you about your valuation I suggest you tell them an old joke, about a drop of gasoline...
|W|P|114631518117459117|W|P|Sliding Scale Valuation Formula|W|P|bomega@gmail.com
Erik at publicworks.nl just mailed me a link to a page for the Computing and Communications Infrastructure Futures Laboratory. They have a logo that is strikingly similar to our logo. The good news: my design looks better!|W|P|114629802188747860|W|P|No original thought?|W|P|bomega@gmail.com
As we are finishing the alpha version of the software we grow more and more anxious and insecure about, well, everything. It's a natural phenomenon to get nervous just before the finish but knowing that is only slightly comforting.
As I was walking home from the office today I noticed a Keyfinder in a shop. It reminded me of all the great inventions that seemed great at first, but weren't after all. When my father first told me about this particular invention (I must have been 8) I was thrilled with excitement over this beautiful and extremely useful gadget. I imagined never losing anything again and saved money until I could finally buy one.
But theory was better than reality as it often is. The keyfinder I got only worked if you were within 10 feet of it, it was clearly in sight and I whistled straight at it in just the right tone. In other words: it didn't work at all.
Stuff like that scares me to death am I'm sure it has this effect on every serious entrepreneur. After all; it is our job (as entrepreneurs) to convince other people of something 'new and improved' and make some money in the process. But sometimes your 'new' isn't much of an improvement and there is no other way to find out than to try and risk everything. And some people get so scared that they might say 'Maybe the timing isn't right' or 'It's not perfect yet, maybe I should wait' which is all nonsense of course. It's just another way of saying 'I am scared shitless'.
And still, every time when I'm nearly finished with a project I feel the same anxiety, which I will now call 'Completion Anxiety Syndrome'. It is that feeling that slowly creeps in and starts messing with your 'Completion Euphoria Status'...|W|P|114599370033778508|W|P|Completion Anxiety Syndrome|W|P|bomega@gmail.com
We are looking for people in Amsterdam who are willing to test the Alpha version of Fleck somewhere in the following week. Testing will take place at the Fleck office and we will shower you with beer and pizza.
You will have to bring your own laptop (Mac, PC, Linux or any other OS as long as it has LRF support) with Firefox installed (and Wi-Fi or Ethernet) as you will be needing that to install the Fleck Extension...
Aha, so it's an extension??? No, Fleck is more than JUST an Extension. But the Extension is an important part of Fleck and we need to test it.
Please contact us if you are willing to participate.|W|P|114595578476477076|W|P|Fleck Alpha Version Testers?|W|P|bomega@gmail.com
Today I received an email from Joseph, one of our regular Fleck Blog readers, with an interesting question. Here it is:
How do you keep a team motivated when there is no revenue. We are about to establish our Corporate Guidelines and the subject of equity came up. How do you establish who gets what piece of the company at start-up, while the site is being rolled out?I was just having a discussion today about the same subject and spend some time thinking about it. There is no easy answer and I'm sure different people have different strategies. My strategy is simple: give away a lot, make big steps soon, try to make the circumstances as ideal as possible to grow big fast. Now before you give away your whole company and then complain to me when this doesn't turn out well, a few words of caution. I have no problem with making other people rich if they help me get rich faster and easier. I have always felt that way and have never regretted it. But this strategy can fail miserably too. You need to be very sure that the partners you have are the right people for the job and that they will indeed make your company or product grow faster and better. So if you are sure that your partners are good and are going to make your company a success I would reward them well. Remember that people get motivated most by being appreciated. Respect is a much better motivator than money. So don't try to negotiate their shares down to the last penny. Show them you respect them, care for their opinion and want to give them a fair share. Explain why the percentage you chose is reasonable and that they are valuable to the company. I call my model the distributed wealth model: make sure your employees are happy and make a lot of money, your customers are satisfied and your investors get rich and you will do fine yourself too.|W|P|114590879500338998|W|P|Distributed Wealth Model|W|P|bomega@gmail.com
On Sunday I was visiting my parents house to celebrate Easter Day. As we drove there we noticed a perfect white rabbit sitting by the side of the road. I stopped to show it to our children and told them it must have been the Easter bunny. My parents hid painted real eggs and chocolate ones in the garden, which the kids had to find, and then had lunch. After lunch I took a nap in my sisters room. As I woke up I looked around the room and noticed a drawing of a white rabbit. I stared at it for a while and noticed that that painting was actually a very good metaphor to starting a company.
When you start a company you have to know the answer to the question:
'How do you paint a white rabbit'In art academy (which I attended) you are taught to think different and one way to practice that is to think in negative shapes. You can paint a white rabbit, or an invisible form, or a bright light by outlining the outside of the form you wish to make visible. In the case of the white rabbit painting in my sisters room there is a background and a shadow which make the white rabbits stand out from the paper. In art academy they call that 'inversion' or 'a negative'. In Flecks case the white rabbit is our product. As you start to establish the company you build the background. We started with a patent, a blog and logo, then a website and a little funding. Then we hired developers and worked up a demo. You could say that we started working on all the stuff around the actual product and the more stuff you but in the background the clearer the white rabbit/our vision becomes. This is a scary procedure. All the time you are building around, talking about and building upon something that simply isn't there yet. You are constantly thinking "this is all background stuff, I want to see the actual product!'. But to get there you have to go through all that other stuff first. It is strange to talk with investors about your dreams and vision. What you are actually trying to do is show them the white rabbit. The more stuff you show (Excel sheets, patents, demos and plans) the more clearer the white rabbit becomes. Then one day, you wake up, and are suddenly staring at a very real and white rabbit and everybody can see it...|W|P|114520215840133105|W|P|How do you paint a white rabbit?|W|P|bomega@gmail.com
Warning: If you like cats and/or have strong feelings about animal cruelty you might be shocked by part of this story.
The first time I started a company I spend a lot of time writing a press-release. On the day we launched I faxed the press release to a few newspapers, relevant magazines and websites. I hoped the press-release would get picked up and make us famous. I was hoping for a spark to start my media engine. And it did.
These days things are different. Sure, I would still write a press-release but just a spark isn’t enough to start an online business and attract millions of users. What you need is (a great product or service and) a Burning Cat Strategy.
When I was in college there were a lot of fires in the city where I lived. Every month a shop that wasn’t doing very well burned down in an effort to collect money from the fire insurance. Most of the time they failed because the investigators, by looking at the source of the fire, could easily show it wasn’t an accident.
But then a strange thing happened. The investigators suddenly were confronted by fires that seemed to have started everywhere in the room. The whole room seemed to have caught fire at once. After a few months of similar fires the investigators started to notice one similarity in those unexplainable fires; they always found a dead cat.
It turned out that the arsonists poured gasoline over the cats and used them as living torches. The burning cats would run around the store and spread the fire everywhere in seconds. Cruel but effective.
You are now thinking ‘Who comes up with such a cruel thing’ and the answer might surprise you. Forrest fires and often spread by burning rabbits and other animals and sometimes fires are spread from one house to another by a burning mouse that tries to escape to the house next door. These criminals probably just watched National Geographic.
I thought of this story as I was trying to explain the marketing strategy of Fleck and other internet companies like us. We can’t rely on a single spark to get us noticed. To start our fire we need a Burning Cat. We use a blog to get users interested before we launch, promise journalists a first look at the beta, talk with potential users, give speeches at universities, design affiliate services, tools for webmasters, collect email-addresses for the beta program, organize a conference and do a hole range of other things to make sure that when we go live we are everywhere.
And even this post is part of our ‘Burning Cat Strategy’. I'm coining the term, partly to get mentioned in the ValleySpeak post on Valleywag, and hope you will use it too. So if you blog about it, please make sure you mention Fleck.com and link to it.
We need all the sparks we can get...|W|P|114511298988515632|W|P|Burning Cat Strategy|W|P|bomega@gmail.com
|W|P|114440758235024543|W|P|Blogger doesn't know what a 'Blog' is???|W|P|bomega@gmail.com
A few weeks ago I read this blog post from Charles from Mailroom (excellent service!) about the cost/reward ratio of attending a conference versus getting mentioned on the Signal vs. Noise blog. Let me quote:
Launch at DEMO Cost: almost $30,000 increase in traffic for two days following: 100% Cost per % increase: $300Brief mention on Signal vs. Noise blog Cost: $0 increase in traffic for two days following: 50% Cost per % increase: $0
As I was reading that post I wondered how I could get the best of both worlds? You DO want to attend a good conference and get your company known. But $30.000??? I figured, for $30.000 I could host a whole conference myself... And so we present to you, the conference from heaven, initiated by Fleck.com, organized by Live Solutions and hosted by Barbizon Palace in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. We called it: The Next Web Conference 2006 We recycled the Fleck webdesign for theNextWeb.org website and I designed a simple but elegant logo and left all the work to a professional organisation. Although it won't make us rich, it will cover our expenses. And we think it is quite cool to actually break even or make a little money on your marketing. We will be able to attend a conference we would love to attend, get to know all the speakers, meet every Web2.0 company in Europe and promote our own company in the process. We did spend a lot of time on how to present ourselves. We decided to sponsor the party and not plaster our logo all over everything. We would like to promote our company but this conference should be more than a vehicle for Fleck promotion. More information: http://www.thenextweb.org|W|P|114440630841054257|W|P|Fleck.com & The Next Web Conference 2006|W|P|bomega@gmail.com